IRS Issues New Forms for 2020

This amount will be net of any liabilities assumed by the partnership on contribution. The current year net income or loss will be “the partner’s distributive share of partnership income and gain (including tax-exempt income) … Minus the partner’s distributive share of partnership loss and deductions (including nondeductible, noncapital expenditures).”All other increases or decreases that affected the partner’s capital account for tax purposes are to be included on the line for other increase (decrease).

XXI. Determination to Add Sodium Chlorite to the List

Comments submitted in response to proposed § 1.56A-20 have generally requested either that changes be made to the deferred sale approach and the deferred distribution gain or loss approach or that different approaches be permitted. Some comments have requested Irs Issues Revised Instructions On 1065 Parter Tax Basis Capital Reporting modifications to proposed § 1.56A-20 to account for the inclusion of partnership liabilities when calculating the amount of AFSI resulting from partnership contributions and distributions, to remove AFSI inclusions resulting from certain transactions, and to modify the acceleration events and the applicable recovery periods. Additionally, other comments have requested allowing for the use of additional subchapter K provisions to account for partnership contributions and distributions. Under proposed § 1.56A-20(c)(2), a contributor would accelerate a portion of its deferred sale gain or loss into its AFSI upon the occurrence of certain events, including if a contributor’s distributive share percentage in the partnership decreases by more than one-third or if the partnership disposes of the deferred sale property. Proposed § 1.56A-5(e)(4)(iii) generally would require the partnership to separately state certain AFSI items that are not taken into account as adjustments to a CAMT entity partner’s distributive share amount. Instead, these AFSI items would be directly taken into account by a CAMT entity partner in determining its AFSI.

Since the amount of metal hydroxide used to produce diethylene glycol monomethyl ether3 is very small, the metal hydroxide has been excluded from the stoichiometric material consumption equation; including the metal hydroxide would lead to a distorted conversion factor. The Treasury and IRS say they want to help partnerships comply with the new instructions, so they’ll issue a notice that provides additional penalty relief for the transition in tax year 2020. In addition, the taxpayers were not allowed to deduct unreimbursed expenses the husband allegedly paid for the partnership, because the taxpayers did not substantiate them. Lastly, the taxpayers were liable for self-employment tax on the guaranteed payments received from the partnership in the first year; however, they were not liable for the tax in the second and third years because the losses allowed would offset the amount of the guaranteed payments, so they had no self-employment income in those years.

SECTION 8. RELIANCE ON PROPOSED §§ 1.56A-5 AND 1.56A-20.

This information will be used by the IRS to confirm that the taxpayer no longer qualifies to make a taxable-income election. Any CAMT entity partner other than a partnership may make a top-down election with respect to one or more partnerships in which it is a direct partner for Federal income tax purposes. If a CAMT entity partner is a direct partner in multiple partnerships, it may make a top-down election with respect to its investments in some partnerships and not its investments in other partnerships. A top-down election may not be made with respect to an investment other than an investment in a partnership. (ii) The top-down amount excludes any FSI or AFSI amounts described in proposed §§ 1.56A-4(c)(1)(i) and (ii), 1.56A-6(c)(2)(iii), or 1.56A-8(b) and (c). See section 3.02(4) of this notice, which instructs how such amounts should be taken into account by a CAMT entity partner in computing its AFSI with respect to a partnership investment for which a top-down election is in effect.

The TCJA added Sec. 163(j), which limits the amount of business interest an entity can deduct each year. Sec. 163(j)(4)(A) requires the limitation on the deduction for business interest expense to be applied at the partnership level and a partner’s adjusted taxable income (ATI) to be increased by the partner’s share of excess taxable income, as defined in Sec. 163(j)(4)(C), but not by the partner’s distributive share of income, gain, deduction, or loss. Sec. 163(j)(4)(B) provides that the amount of partnership business interest expense limited by Sec. 163(j)(1) is carried forward at the partner level. Sec. 163(j)(4)(B)(ii) provides that excess business interest expense (EBIE) allocated to a partner and carried forward is available to be deducted in a subsequent year only if the partnership allocates excess taxable income to the partner. Sec. 163(j)(4)(B)(iii) provides rules for the adjusted basis in a partnership of a partner that is allocated EBIE.

SECTION 3. TOP-DOWN ELECTION

The Tax Court disallowed the share of partnership losses claimed by the husband in the first year at issue because all of the partnership’s loss had been allocated to another partner on the partnership’s amended return for the year. Thus, the taxpayers were not able to establish that the partnership allocated any loss to the husband in the first year in question. (ii) Since the amount of metal hydroxide used to produce propylene glycol n-propyl ether is very small, the metal hydroxide has been excluded from the stoichiometric material consumption equation; including the metal hydroxide would lead to a distorted conversion factor. Classification numbers proposed by each petitioner are included in paragraph (b) of each part, after each specific determination. The classification numbers provided with respect to a taxable substance are not part of the determination of whether it is added to the List and do not impact whether such substance is a taxable substance.

IR-2020-240: IRS releases draft Form 1065 instructions on partner tax basis capital reporting

If the partnership makes a guaranteed payment within the meaning of § 707(c) that is deductible for regular tax purposes, solely for purposes of this section 5.02(2)(b), the provisions of the partnership agreement that the partnership uses to allocate net § 704(b) income or loss are considered to include the provisions of the partnership agreement relating to such guaranteed payment. Section 56A(e) authorizes the Secretary to provide such regulations and other guidance as necessary to carry out the purposes of § 56A, including regulations and other guidance relating to the effect of the rules of § 56A on partnerships with income taken into account by an applicable corporation. Beginning with tax years ending on or after December 31, 2020, all capital accounts must be reported on a tax basis. While not an absolute requirement for tax year 2020 due to IRS penalty relief, changes were made in the TaxAct 1065 product to reflect these instruction changes. In Frost,46 a taxpayer who was an enrolled agent and former IRS revenue officer was not allowed to deduct losses from a partnership he formed because he did not establish his adjusted basis in the partnership interest. The taxpayer provided as documentation only self-prepared tax returns and Schedules K-1.

In yet another case,47 the Tax Court determined that the IRS met its burden of proof that the taxpayer, a CPA and tax consultant, did not substantiate his basis in his partnership interests and so could not deduct partnership losses attributed to the partnerships. The taxpayer submitted a promissory note and business loan agreement to substantiate his basis; however, the IRS and the court found that neither contract was fully executed, and, even if they were, the loan documents were incomplete and predated the years in question. The taxpayer also failed to establish the partners’ outside bases in the partnership, since he provided no capital account, financial, or business records and only incomplete bank account records. The court determined that the payments the taxpayer made as part of the property settlement to his ex-wife did not increase the S corporation’s basis in the partnership interest under Sec. 705(a)(1) because the payments did not affect its distributive share of the partnership’s income or deductions. The S corporation’s basis was also not increased under Sec. 722 or 752(a) because the payments did not result in the partnership’s receipt of any money or other property and the taxpayer did not assume any of the partnership’s liabilities.

• A taxable-income election may not be made with respect to an investment other than an investment in a partnership.
• Upon a contribution of property to the partnership to which § 721(a) applies, the contributor’s initial CAMT basis in its partnership investment would be the contributor’s AFS basis in the acquired partnership investment, decreased by any deferred sale gain or increased by any deferred sale loss that is required to be included in the contributor’s AFSI under the deferred sale approach.
• In Thoma,44married taxpayers deducted business expenses, health insurance expenses, payments to a SIMPLE IRA, and half of the husband’s self-employment tax, based on the assertion that the husband was a partner in a partnership.
• Sec. 163(j)(4)(B) provides that the amount of partnership business interest expense limited by Sec. 163(j)(1) is carried forward at the partner level.

If a partner disposes of a partnership interest, the adjusted basis of the partnership interest is increased immediately before the disposition by the entire amount of the partner’s remaining EBIE (“basis addback rule”). Partners also may now add back a proportionate basis on partial sales of partnership interests. The proposed regulations require the partnership to create a new block of “inert” basis in the assets equal to the amount added back on the sale or distribution. Mr. Lovett has extensive experience serving the tax needs of both public companies and closely-held businesses, including all aspects of tax compliance for partnerships and corporations. He advises clients with regard to the structure and tax consequences of new business ventures, and assists with restructuring existing businesses for increased tax efficiency. Prior to joining his firm, he was with a “Big 4” accounting firm, working closely with large, multinational real estate investment companies.

Tax Tools & Tips

• He advises clients with regard to the structure and tax consequences of new business ventures, and assists with restructuring existing businesses for increased tax efficiency.
• However, the court did not have jurisdiction to consider the penalties because they were deemed a partnership item under TEFRA.
• Kim Brown, 40, of Augusta, GA, pleaded guilty to two counts of aiding and assisting in the preparation and filing of false income tax returns, according to the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Georgia.
• In addition, because the taxpayer was able to prove sufficient basis with the loan guarantee, he was allowed to deduct his share of partnership suspended losses.
• For the taxable year in which the taxable-income election ceases to be in effect, the CAMT entity partner must attach a statement to its Federal income tax return disclosing the reasons for the termination of the taxable-income election.

Under “Current year net income (loss)”, the instructions state to enter each partner’s distributive share of partnership income and gain as figured for tax purposes for the year, minus the partner’s distributive share of partnership loss and deductions as figured for tax purposes of the year. This means that net income per the books is not used in computing the partner capital accounts. The Secretary followed the process in section 4672(a)(2)(B) in making the determination to add nylon 6 to the List. A review of the stoichiometric material consumption equation in the corrected petition, as provided in the supplemental notice of filing, and other information in the petition shows that the taxable chemicals benzene, propylene, ammonia, and methane constitute more than 20 percent by weight of the materials used in the production of nylon 6, based on the predominant method of production.

Modified previously taxed capital method

The proposed regulations provided that if a partnership disposes of an asset, the partnership’s holding period in the asset controls. If a partner disposes of an API, generally, the partner’s holding period in the API controls.The proposed regulations also included a limited lookthrough rule, which was then modified by the final regulations issued in January 2021. If the lookthrough rule applies, a percentage of the gain or loss on the sale is potentially subject to Sec. 1061(a) recharacterization based on the relative gain inside the partnership on a hypothetical sale of the partnership’s assets at their aggregate fair market value (FMV). Partnerships with less than $250,000 in sales and $1 million in assets (those able to omit completion of Schedule L, M-1, and M-2) are not required to report capital account changes in Item L of the Schedule K-1. All other partnerships must report and maintain partners’ tax basis capital accounts on partnership returns. The instructions to Form 1065 make it clear that partners’ capital accounts should be reported using the tax basis method.

Her diversified experience includes working on a broad range of structuring and operational issues in a variety of industries and areas. Kim Brown, 40, of Augusta, GA, pleaded guilty to two counts of aiding and assisting in the preparation and filing of false income tax returns, according to the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Georgia. Superseded describes a situation where the new ruling does nothing more than restate the substance and situation of a previously published ruling (or rulings). Thus, the term is used to republish under the 1986 Code and regulations the same position published under the 1939 Code and regulations. The term is also used when it is desired to republish in a single ruling a series of situations, names, etc., that were previously published over a period of time in separate rulings.

10In tax years beginning in 2019 or 2020, at the taxpayer’s election, the 30%-of-ATI limitation is 50% of ATI. Another CARES Act change relates to the interaction between Sec. 163(j) and Sec. 168(k). Under the TCJA, Sec. 168(g)(1)(F) requires the alternative depreciation system to be applied to any nonresidential real property, residential rental property, and QIP held by an electing real property trade or business. Sec. 163(j)(7)(B) defines an electing real property trade or business as any trade or business described in Sec. 469(c)(7)(C) that makes an election to be an electing real property trade or business. Supplemented is used in situations in which a list, such as a list of the names of countries, is published in a ruling and that list is expanded by adding further names in subsequent rulings. After the original ruling has been supplemented several times, a new ruling may be published that includes the list in the original ruling and the additions, and supersedes all prior rulings in the series.